[ad_1]
This article originally appeared on Interested in trade.
OpenAI has responded publicly Lawsuit against Elon Musk On Tuesday, in a blog post, he revealed new details about Musk’s relationship with the company.
“We are saddened that it has come to this with someone we greatly admired — someone who inspired us to aim higher, then told us we would fail, started a competitor, and then sued us when we started making meaningful progress toward the OpenAI mission without him,” read the statement. Blog postwhich published a series of internal emails between Musk and OpenAI executives dating between 2015 and 2018.
Musk’s lawyers and OpenAI representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.
In the lawsuit filed on Friday, musk OpenAI and its leaders have been accused of abandoning their open source principles by partnering with Microsoft. She argued that the company’s focus for 2019 is a “Profit is fixed” The department is in breach of its original 2015 contract as a nonprofit.
the Tesla CEO He left OpenAI’s board of directors in 2018, but Musk’s lawyers said in the lawsuit that he continued to contribute to the company until 2020.
RELATED: Elon Musk sues ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, accuses company of working to ‘maximize profits for Microsoft, not for the benefit of humanity’
In the first of the emails OpenAI published on Tuesday, written in November 2015, Musk wrote: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman The company’s president, Greg Brockman, said the company should seek funding equivalent to “a figure much larger than $100 million to avoid looking hopeless compared to what Google or Facebook are spending.”
“I think we should say we’re starting with a $1 billion funding commitment,” Musk wrote. “It’s true. I’ll cover everything no one else does.”
The blog post, written by Altman, Brockman and other OpenAI executives, says Musk — who was sitting at the time OpenAI panel As the rest of the company’s leaders discussed the best financial path forward, it became clear in late 2017 among all parties involved that a for-profit structure was the only way to ensure the company would be able to secure adequate funding in its pursuit of the goal. Developing artificial general intelligence.
“Elon wanted a majority stake, initial control of the board, and become CEO. In the middle of these discussions, he withheld financing. Reid Hoffman “We have closed the gap to cover payroll and operations,” the post read. “We could not agree on profit terms with Elon because we felt that it conflicted with the mission of any individual to have absolute control over OpenAI. He then proposed instead to integrate OpenAI into Tesla.”
The post goes on to highlight a February 2018 email chain sent from Musk to Brockman and OpenAI co-founder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskeverwith an unnamed third party suggesting that the most promising path forward for OpenAI is to “tied with Tesla as its cash cow.”
While forwarding the email, Musk wrote that the unnamed author of the proposal was “absolutely right,” adding: “Tesla is the only track that can even hope to hold a candle to Google. Even then, there’s potential for it to be a counterweight to Google.” “. “Small. It’s not zero.”
“Elon quickly chose to leave OpenAI, saying that our probability of success was 0, and that he planned to build a competitor to AGI within Tesla,” the blog post said. “When he left in late February 2018, he told our team that he supported us in finding our own way to raise billions of dollars. In December 2018, Elon sent us an email saying ‘even raising several hundred million won’t be enough.’ This needs billions of dollars a year immediately.” “Or forget it.”
The latest drama between Musk and Altmanet al. the. It was revealed just weeks after OpenAI completed the deal The company’s value is estimated at $80 billion.
Although he has publicly criticized OpenAI several times since his departure, Musk recently doubled down on his public questions about the legality and ethics of OpenAI’s financial structure, writing in a post on X in mid-February that he had been offered shares at “various points,” but… It seemed immoral/ Illegal to accept” and in interviews claimed that OpenAI “It wouldn’t exist without me“.
Tuesday’s blog post, which He says OpenAI intends to move to deny all of Musk’s claims, ending with assurances that despite Musk’s accusations, OpenAI is “focused on advancing our mission” and has a “long way to go.”
“As we continue to make our tools even better, we are excited to deploy these systems so that they empower everyone.”
Axel Springer, the parent company of Business Insider, has a global deal to let OpenAI train its models on its media brand reports.
[ad_2]
Source link
