[ad_1]
Meta’s Oversight Board is once again taking over the social network’s rules for AI-generated content. The Council accepted two cases relating to explicit images of public figures by artificial intelligence.
While Meta’s rules already prohibit nudity on Facebook and Instagram, the board said in a statement that it wants to address whether “Meta’s policies and enforcement practices are effective in addressing explicit images generated by artificial intelligence.” Artificial intelligence-generated images of celebrities, politicians and other public figures, sometimes referred to as “deep porn,” have become an increasingly prominent form of online harassment and have sparked a wave of harassment. Either way, the Oversight Board could push Meta to adopt new rules to address such harassment on its platform.
The oversight board said it did not name the two public figures at the center of each case in an attempt to avoid further harassment, although it described the circumstances surrounding each post.
One case involves an Instagram post featuring an AI-generated photo of a nude Indian woman posted by an account that “only shares AI-generated photos of Indian women.” The post was reported to Meta but the report was closed after 48 hours because it had not been reviewed. The same user appealed this decision but the appeal was also closed and was never reviewed. Meta eventually removed the post after the user appealed to the Oversight Board and the board agreed to take up the case.
The second case concerns a Facebook post in a group dedicated to AI art. The post in question showed “an AI-generated image of a naked woman with a man groping her breasts.” The woman was meant to resemble an “American public figure” and her name was also in the caption of the post. The post was automatically removed because it was previously reported and Meta’s internal systems were able to match it to the previous post. The user appealed the removal decision but the appeal was automatically “closed”. The user then appealed to the Oversight Board, which agreed to consider the case.
In a statement, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, co-chair of the oversight board, said the board examined the two cases from two different countries in order to evaluate potential disparities in how Meta policies are implemented. “We know that Meta is faster and more effective at moderating content in some markets and languages than others,” Thorning-Schmidt said. “By taking one case from the US and one from India, we want to look at whether Meta is protecting all women globally in a fair way.”
The Oversight Board is requesting public comment within the next two weeks and will publish its decision sometime over the next few weeks, along with Meta’s policy recommendations. A similar operation involving a misleadingly edited video recently led to Meta approving more AI-generated content on its platform.
[ad_2]
Source link
